In September, NCVO published a report
of the Pathways Through Participation project.
This lottery funded piece of work, undertaken in partnership with Involve and the Institutefor Volunteering Research, gained some sectorpress coverage for its finding that government encouragement “deters
people from volunteering”.
However, look behind the
perhaps obvious headline and there is much to be gleaned from the summary
report that is useful to volunteer managers, although the focus is on many
forms of participation not just volunteering.
The researchers conclude
that participation takes place when four elements are present: a personal
motivation, a trigger, resources and opportunities. Perhaps the most immediately relevant to
volunteer managers is motivation.
The report highlights six motivations to
participate: helping others, developing relationships, exercising values and
beliefs, having influence, personal benefit and being part of something. They then go on to expand on the social
dynamic of participation, stating that:
“A desire to make and/or embed social connections, meet new people and combat isolation or loneliness led many people to get involved in a collective activity. The human desire to be with others in a joint endeavour, and the strength and quality of the relationships between fellow participants that grow through belonging to a group, came through vividly in our research.”
This reinforces one of the
headline findings of Volunteer Canada’s Bridging theGap report from earlier in the year.
People increasingly want to volunteer in groups, either a pre-existing
group coming forward to volunteer, or to engage with others and form groups
through volunteering.
As volunteer managers we need
to provide opportunities for people do just that through volunteering with our
organisations. Indeed, the report also
observes the potential for groups to help with volunteer retention, noting that
“the relationships that are built in groups
are a crucial sustaining factor in people’s participation”.
The researchers also
highlight that “people’s participation is
dynamic and constantly evolving” as of
people’s motivations are complex and change over time, something Bridging the
Gap also noted but many other studies of volunteer motivation fail to do.
“Almost everyone we spoke to had experienced some degree of fluctuation in the levels of intensity and frequency of their involvement, depending on what was happening in their lives. Participation was characterised by ebbs and flows, starts and stops, a mix of one-offs, short- and long-term commitments…”
Often organisations make
varying degrees of effort to understand a volunteer’s motivation when they
first recruit them and then fail to re-assess this over time to see if
motivations have altered and therefore whether the person’s volunteering needs
to adapt accordingly.
As Pathways Through
Participation highlights, such complexities in motivation are “crucial to understanding motivations for
participation” as “any attempt to encourage
participation must take into account the differing and multiple motivations
people have for becoming and staying involved” for we must provide “the environment, conditions and
opportunities for an individual to translate their motivation into action”.
Equally significant is the
finding that, apart from these factors of changing motivations, “a good quality participation experience was
the single most important reason interviewees gave to explain their sustained
participation”. Additionally, “people participated in order to specifically
achieve something”.
In other words, give
volunteers roles that make a difference and a quality experience and you
greatly enhance your ability to continue to engage people in giving you their
time.
This validates the importance of volunteer managers
investing time and effort into developing meaningful roles for volunteers. As Steve McCurley
and Rick Lynch put it, "The primary ‘problem’ in volunteer involvement right now does not
lie in finding new volunteers, it lies in enabling those who are already
involved to accomplish productive work."
Organisations have to offer
opportunities that fit with people’s complex lives, meet the needs of
organisation and/or client group/beneficiary and deliver a great experience,
when that could mean different things to different people. This isn’t science, it isn’t an A+B+C=D
process driven approach with predictable outcomes. It is more akin to alchemy with a complex
interplay of frequently changing factors that must be juggled and balanced to
achieve a one or more outcomes for all concerned.
When seen in this way
perhaps the question is not whether organisations can afford a volunteer
manager (as many all to readily ask when times get tough) but whether they can
afford not to have a volunteer manager.
“Improving participation opportunities requires starting where people are and taking account of their concerns and interests, providing a range of opportunities and levels of involvement so people can feel comfortable with taking part, and using the personal approach to invite and welcome people in.”
In conclusion, my view is
that Pathways Through Participation is telling is us as volunteer managers that
we need to consider: how we can engage people in groups or in group work; how
we are aware of and responding to changing motivations; and how we create and
adapt opportunities for volunteers that given them a great experience.
Pathways Through
Participation adds to a compelling body of research, anecdotal and experiential
evidence that should be stimulating organisations and volunteer managers
re-think their approach to engaging and keeping volunteers.
Please do feel free to
share your views on the Pathways Through Participation report by leaving your
comments below.
If you’d like to talk to
Rob about how Rob Jackson Consulting Ltd can help you think through these
issues in regard to your own organisation please do drop him a line.
[NB - The Pathways Through Participation team have produced their own summary of findings relating to volunteering].
No comments:
Post a Comment